Dianthus Medical blog

More dodgy statistics

Back in April, I wrote that perhaps I should start a “dodgy statistic of the month competition”. OK, May and June have been and gone with no more nominations, so I’ll make up for it by nominating 3 for July.
The first nomination goes to Vince Cable. This surprises me, as he is one of the [...]

Continue reading >>

No comments Filed under Statistics



Plagiarism hurts

First of all, for blindingly obvious reasons, I should acknowledge that the title of this blog post is not original. “Plagiarism hurts” was the title of an article in EMWA’s journal The Write Stuff by Elise Langdon-Neuner, its editor-in-chief (page 13 of this issue, 1.6 MB pdf). I’m sure that Elise won’t mind me re-using [...]

Continue reading >>

5 comments Filed under Dreadful science reporting in the media Medical ethics Medical writing



UK Biobank part 4

For anyone who hasn’t yet read the first 3 parts of this story, they are here, here, and here. Just to recap, my main concern is that the NHS disclosed my confidential data (and the data of about 5 million other people) to the UK Biobank team without my consent.
OK, now we’re all up to [...]

Continue reading >>

No comments Filed under Medical ethics



Internships available

Are you trying to get a job in medical writing but finding it difficult without experience?
We currently have internships available for bright and motivated individuals wanting to start a career in medical writing. You will be helping with a research project in medical writing, and seeing the day-to-day work in a medical writing company at [...]

Continue reading >>

No comments Filed under Company news Medical writing Recruitment



New Lancet policy on systematic reviews

The Lancet have recently introduced an interesting new policy. They now require anyone submitting the results of research (not just randomised trials, apparently, but all research) to The Lancet to include a systematic review with their research. This can be a reference to a recently published systematic review, but if no such review exists, then [...]

Continue reading >>

3 comments Filed under Medical writing Statistics