A new record in biomedical publishing?
I have recently done a little piece of research on whether professional medical writers improve the quality of biomedical publications, and am now ready to get it published. Sadly, I have just had the paper rejected by the journal PLoS One, but in the process I think I may have set a new publishing record, albeit perhaps not the most prestigious record in the whole world.
The online manuscript submission system of PLoS one gives a detailed timeline of what happens to the manuscript. Here is what the timeline looks like for mine:
|Decision Sent to Author||2010-05-28 05:08:59|
|Manuscript Rejected||2010-05-28 05:08:58|
|Under Review||2010-05-28 05:07:06|
|Section Editor Assigned||2010-05-28 05:07:06|
|Waiting for Section Editor Assignment||2010-05-28 05:06:47|
|Initial QC Complete||2010-05-28 05:06:46|
|Initial QC Started||2010-05-21 07:23:11|
|Author Approved Converted Files||2010-05-21 07:23:10|
|Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files||2010-05-21 06:00:06|
|File Conversion Complete||2010-05-21 06:00:06|
|Waiting for File Conversion||2010-05-21 05:51:18|
|Waiting for Files to be Sorted||2010-05-21 05:49:17|
|Manuscript Submitted||2010-05-21 05:49:17|
|Manuscript Files Submitted||2010-05-21 05:49:17|
You will notice that it took just 1 minute and 52 seconds after my manuscript was assigned to an editor before it was rejected. My rejection letter also included the phrase "Having discussed the paper with our internal editors", so that 1 minute and 52 seconds presumably also included time for that discussion as well as reading the paper.
Is this a new record for the time taken for a journal to reject a paper?